Agilent Technologies A
Healthcare · Medical - Diagnostics & Research · Synthos Deep Dive · 2026-07-03
The Overview
Agilent makes the scientific instruments and testing supplies that labs use to analyze chemicals, medicines, food, and DNA — machines like chromatographs and mass spectrometers, plus the consumables, columns, and service contracts those machines need every day. That "razor-and-blade" mix (sell the machine once, sell the supplies and service forever) makes the business steady and very profitable.
Is the stock cheap or expensive? Fairly-to-fully priced. You pay about $26 for every $1 the company earned last year — a premium, but not crazy for a business this good. The problem is it's only growing modestly, so you're not getting a bargain and you're not getting fast growth either.
Our verdict is Watch — a good company we'd happily own on a dip, but not a table-pounding buy at today's price.
Here's what our three scores mean in everyday terms:
- Downside Risk 4/10 (below average, i.e. reasonably safe). Low debt and reliable cash flow, but the stock can still swing with the economy and there's no cheapness to cushion a stumble.
- Growth Quality 6/10 (good, not great). A durable, profitable business — but growing slowly, so "quality" without much "speed."
- Exponential Potential 3/10 (low). This is a mature, steady grower, not a rocket ship. Don't expect it to double quickly.
The one big worry: Agilent's customers (drug companies, China labs, universities) buy big machines in cycles. When their budgets tighten, Agilent's growth slows — and there's no valuation discount to protect you if that happens.
Putting a number on it: our fair-value estimate is $145 against a current price of $153.85 — a premium price for a business we still like.
Our summary metrics
Low leverage (net-debt/EBITDA 0.79x) & fortress cash flow, but 26x trailing / 22x forward on a mid-single-digit grower and beta 1.26.
High-quality recurring razor-and-blade model, 53% GM, 21% ROE — but only ~6% revenue and ~10% EPS CAGR; quality without much speed.
Decelerated already; ~$37B cap in a mature, cyclical instruments market with no acceleration and modest room to run.
What does “fair value” mean?
Fair value is Synthos’s estimate of what one share is worth today, based on our model of the company’s future cash generation and the risks to it. It is not a price target or a prediction of where the stock trades next quarter — it’s the price where we think risk and reward are balanced. Above it, you’re paying for outcomes better than our base case; below it, the market is offering a margin of safety.
The model’s inputs and weightings are proprietary — they’re the product. What we publish is the output, plus an independent, public-math cross-check further down the page (“Check our number”) so you can judge it for yourself.
What do the 5 tiers mean? (Core · Tactical · Watch · Hold · Avoid)
Exponential Potential
Decelerated already; ~$37B cap in a mature, cyclical instruments market with no acceleration and modest room to run.
What could take this further than the base case — and where the market may be underpricing it. Full forward-growth and acceleration math in Deeper analysis, §4 below.
Deeper analysis
Technicals, fundamentals, valuation, and the full expert-claim evidence panel — the detail behind the numbers above.
Reference table
| Street consensus | $154.75 (high $165 / low $140; 1 Strong Buy · 31 Buy · 8 Hold · 1 Sell) — context, not our anchor |
| Valuation | 26× trailing EPS · 22× FY26E · 20× FY27E · ~15× FY30E (non-GAAP) · EV/S 5.3× · EV/EBITDA 19.6× |
| Technicals | Neutral — $130.69, −17% off 52-wk high, right at 200-DMA, above 50-DMA, RSI 52, +8.5% 12-mo (SPY +20.6%) |
| Conviction | None — 0 net-bullish voices, 0 traceable KB claims. Call rests on fundamentals + quant only |
| Position sizing | If owned, a ~2–3% quality-defensive holding; no urgency to add here |
What the experts actually said
No independent expert claims in the Synthos knowledge base yet for A — this dive is fundamentals- and technicals-driven, not panel-driven.
Price & moving averages 12 months · 50 & 200-day averages · 52-week range
Solid line = price · dashed line = 50-day average · dotted line = 200-day average · the two thin horizontal lines mark the 52-week high and low. Price above both averages is an uptrend.
Data summary: last close $153.84, 10% above the 50-day average ($140), 17% above the 200-day average ($132) — an uptrend. 3% below the 52-week high of $159, 40% above the 52-week low of $110.
Bollinger Bands 20-day average ± 2 standard deviations
The shaded band widens when the stock gets more volatile. Riding the upper edge = strong momentum (sometimes stretched); the lower edge = weak / potentially oversold.
Data summary: price $153.84 is currently inside the band (band $138–$161).
RSI (14) momentum gauge · 0–100
Above 70 (overbought zone, shaded) = overbought, below 30 (oversold zone, shaded) = oversold. Currently 61.
MACD 12 / 26 / 9 · trend & momentum
The MACD line crossing above the signal line (bars flip to the up color) = momentum turning up; crossing below (bars flip to the down color) = turning down. Bar height = the size of that gap.
Data summary: MACD is currently above its signal line by 0.02, positive momentum.
Relative performance vs S&P 500 & its sector (XLV (sector)), set to 100 a year ago
Solid = A · dashed = S&P 500 · dotted = XLV (sector). A rising line means it is beating that benchmark — the sector line shows whether it is a leader or laggard within its own group.
Forward revenue & earnings actual → estimate · "FY" = fiscal year, "E" = estimate
Darker bars = actual results, brighter = analyst estimates. Taller bars to the right = expected growth.
Key stats an RIA wants
1. What it is
Agilent Technologies (NYSE: A) is a ~$37B global maker of analytical and clinical laboratory technologies — instruments, consumables, software, and services for the life-sciences, diagnostics, and applied-chemistry markets. Spun out of Hewlett-Packard in 1999, its core products are liquid and gas chromatography (LC/GC) systems, mass spectrometry (LC-MS, GC-MS, ICP-MS), spectroscopy, cell analysis, and genomics/diagnostics tools (arrays, NGS target enrichment, pathology staining). The business model is a classic razor-and-blade: instruments pull through a long, recurring tail of columns, reagents, service contracts, and software. Fiscal year ends October 31. CEO Padraig McDonnell; ~18,000 employees.
Revenue mix (FY2025 = $6.95B; note Agilent reorganized segments in FY2025):
- By operating group (FY25 as reported): the company now reports three groups — Life Sciences & Diagnostics (LDG), Agilent CrossLab (ACG) (the recurring consumables/services engine, ~$2.9B), and Applied Markets (AMG) (~$1.3B). (FMP's product tags are mid-transition — historically Life Sciences & Applied Markets ~$3.2B, Diagnostics & Genomics ~$1.65B, CrossLab ~$1.6B in FY24 — treat the exact split as approximate through the reorg.)
- By geography (FMP tag, FY25): Americas ~$2.81B · Asia-Pacific ~$2.22B · Europe ~$1.92B. Roughly balanced, but with meaningful China / Asia-Pacific exposure — a swing factor when Chinese lab capex softens.
The strategic story management keeps returning to is the "Ignite Operating System" — an internal operational-transformation and margin-expansion program — plus a steady cadence of instrument refreshes (e.g. the new 9500 ICP-MS platform) driving a replacement cycle.
2. The expert thesis — why the panel is bullish (traceable)
There is no expert coverage of Agilent in the Synthos knowledge base. total_claims = 0, net_bullish_voices = 0, and the top list is empty. No independent voice in our tracked panel has published a traceable, distilled claim on this name.
That means this deep dive carries no conviction rating and cites zero claim_ids — because there are none to cite, and fabricating conviction is against the house standard. The verdict below is entirely fundamentals- and quant-driven: it rests on the reported financials, the analyst-consensus estimate path (labeled as estimates), management's own guidance (half-weighted, §9), and Synthos's own scoring model. Readers who require expert-panel corroboration should treat this as a quant screen, not a conviction call.
3. Synthos scores & the Bull / Base / Bear cases
The one-glance judgment — three scores, 0–10, each anchored to real metrics (not probabilities we can't honestly calibrate):
| Score | 0–10 | The read |
|---|---|---|
| Downside Risk (lower = safer) | 4 · Below-average risk | Net-debt/EBITDA 0.79×, interest coverage ~15×, FCF ~$1.15B, current ratio 2.1× — financially sturdy. Offsets: 26× trailing / 22× forward on a mid-single-digit grower, beta 1.26, −27% max drawdown, and end-market cyclicality leave little cushion. |
| Growth Quality | 6 · Good | 53% gross margin, 21% ROE, 12.5% ROIC, a sticky recurring razor-and-blade base and margin expansion via "Ignite." But forward revenue CAGR is only ~6% and EPS CAGR ~10% — high quality, modest speed. |
| Exponential Potential | 3 · Low | Growth is not accelerating (already decelerated to mid-single-digits), the instruments TAM is mature and cyclical, and a ~$37B cap in that market offers limited room to run. Durable compounder, not a multibagger. |
The three cases (our own scenario model — assumptions shown; each target is a ~12–18-month fair value). We deliberately do not attach probabilities: the base case is by definition the expected path, so a weighted blend would just restate it with false precision. Instead the cases bound the range, and the scores above summarize them. (EPS figures below are non-GAAP consensus, consistent with how Agilent guides and how the Street multiples the stock.)
| Case | Key assumptions | Fair value |
|---|---|---|
| Bull | Replacement cycle + China recovery lift core growth to high-single-digits; "Ignite" drives margin above plan. FY27E EPS beats to ~$6.90 (vs $6.60 cons); multiple re-rates to a quality-tools ~25×. | ~$172 (+32%) |
| Base (our anchor) | Estimates roughly hit — FY27E non-GAAP EPS $6.60; a steady ~6% grower with 53% GM and 21% ROE earns a ~22× multiple. | ~$145 (+11%) |
| Bear | Pharma/China lab capex stays soft, replacement cycle stalls; FY27E EPS misses to ~$6.20 and the multiple de-rates to ~18× on slower growth. | ~$112 (−14%) |
Synthos fair value = the base case, ~$145 (+11%), with the full $112–$172 span as the honest range. This anchor sits modestly below the Street's $154.75 consensus (we are less willing to pay up for a mid-single-digit grower without a catalyst). This is a tracked call — the Forecaster Scorecard grades it once it matures.
4. Exponential Potential
Synthos separates compounders (durable high returns on capital) from exponentials (accelerating, multi-baggers-from-here). Agilent is a quality compounder with low exponential potential:
- Forward growth: revenue CAGR FY25→FY30E ~6.2% ($6.95B → $9.37B est); non-GAAP EPS CAGR FY26→FY30E ~9.8% ($6.06 → $8.82 est), helped by buybacks and margin expansion.
- Acceleration (the 2nd derivative) is flat-to-slightly-positive, off a low base: core revenue growth guided to ~4.5–6.0% for FY26, up modestly from a soft FY24/FY25 trough — a cyclical recovery, not a structural acceleration. This is the opposite of the forward-inflecting profile Synthos hunts for in its flagship sleeve.
- Room to run: the analytical-instruments + lab-consumables TAM is large but mature and cyclical, and at ~$37B Agilent is already a scaled incumbent. A 3–5× from here would require a re-rating and a growth regime the business has not shown. Room to run is modest.
- Reinvestment runway: capex is light (~2.7% of revenue), FCF conversion is high (~$1.15B FCF), and the company returns cash via buybacks (~$425M FY25) and a growing dividend — a return-of-capital story more than a reinvest-for-hypergrowth story.
Exponential Potential: Low (3/10). Own Agilent for durable high-single-digit earnings compounding and shareholder returns, not for a fast multibagger. A small, accelerating name with these margins would score much higher; a mature ~$37B incumbent growing ~6% does not.
5. Financials (real numbers — FMP annual/quarterly)
- Revenue: FY25 $6.95B, +6.7% (FY24 $6.51B; FY23 $6.83B — note FY24 was a down year, so growth is a cyclical rebound off a trough). TTM revenue ~$7.23B.
- Quarterly trajectory (recovery underway): Q1'25 $1.68B → Q2 $1.67B → Q3 $1.74B → Q4 $1.86B → Q1'26 $1.80B → Q2'26 $1.84B (+10.0% reported, +6.3% core YoY). Sequentially healthy; the trough appears behind it.
- Margins: gross 53.0% TTM, EBITDA 27.1%, GAAP operating ~21.5%, net 19.6% TTM. Management reports Q2'26 non-GAAP operating margin of 26.4%, +130 bps YoY — the "Ignite" margin story is showing up.
- Earnings: FY25 GAAP net income $1.30B, EPS $4.59 (diluted $4.57); TTM GAAP EPS ~$5.00. Non-GAAP EPS runs higher (FY26 guided $6.00–$6.10). Q2'26 GAAP EPS $1.20 (+60% YoY, aided by a low tax quarter); non-GAAP $1.49 (+14%).
- Cash flow: FY25 operating CF $1.56B, capex ~−$0.41B, FCF ~$1.15B (FCF yield ~3.4%). High-quality, cash-generative earnings (income quality ~1.03).
- Balance sheet: total debt $3.35B, cash $1.79B, net debt $1.57B, net-debt/EBITDA 0.79× — comfortably investment-grade (FMP letter rating A-). Goodwill/intangibles $4.9B (from past deals) is ~39% of assets — an acquisition-built book to keep an eye on, but not alarming.
6. Valuation — priced in or room?
Agilent is fairly-to-fully valued, not cheap. On trailing GAAP it trades 26× EPS, 5.1× sales, 19.6× EV/EBITDA, 5.2× book. On the non-GAAP basis the Street uses, forward P/E is ~22× (FY26E $6.06) → ~20× (FY27E $6.60) → ~15× (FY30E $8.82) — the multiple compresses over time if estimates hit, but you are paying ~22× today for a ~6% revenue grower. The PEG on that math is unflattering (forward PEG >2 per FMP). FMP's letter rating is A- (strong ROE/ROA scores, weaker P/E and debt-to-equity sub-scores) — a quality signal, not a value signal.
Street targets (context, not our anchor): consensus $154.75, median $156.50, high $165, low $140 — the whole Street range sits above today's $131, i.e. the sell side sees ~18% upside. Our base FV of $145 is deliberately more conservative: we won't pay a growth multiple for mid-single-digit growth absent an accelerant. Bottom line: a high-quality-at-a-full-price stock — attractive on a pullback, unremarkable here.
7. Technicals (from the tech block)
- Trend: neutral. $130.69 sits above the 50-DMA ($123.44) but right on the 200-DMA ($130.69) — the stock is at its own multi-month pivot, neither breaking out nor breaking down. MACD +2.2 (mildly positive).
- Location: −16.9% off the 52-week high ($157.20) and +18.6% off the 52-week low ($110.24) — mid-range, with a meaningful −27% max drawdown from peak on record (a reminder this is a cyclical, not a low-vol staple).
- Momentum: RSI(14) 52 — neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. No stretched-entry signal either way.
- Relative strength (the tell): A +8.5% 12-mo vs SPY +20.6% and QQQ +30.3% — a clear laggard over the past year. 3-mo +14.1% roughly matches SPY (+13.7%) but trails QQQ (+22.0%); 6-mo −5.0% vs SPY +8.4%. Persistent underperformance.
- Read: technicals are neutral-to-cautious and do not argue for urgency. The stock is at its 200-DMA pivot after a year of lagging the market — consistent with our "Watch, buy the dip" stance. A decisive hold above the 200-DMA on a good earnings print would firm the setup; a break below would reopen the low-$120s.
8. Moat & competitive position
Agilent's moat is real but narrow-to-wide, not fortress: (1) a large installed base of instruments that locks in a recurring, high-margin tail of consumables, columns, and service (the CrossLab group) — high switching costs once a lab standardizes on Agilent methods; (2) brand and regulatory validation — analytical methods are validated to specific instruments, so replacement is sticky; (3) scale in R&D and global service. The competitive frame is a rational oligopoly in analytical instruments (Agilent, Thermo Fisher, Waters, Bruker, Danaher/SCIEX, PerkinElmer/Revvity), where players compete on performance and service more than price. The binding constraints are end-market cyclicality (pharma R&D budgets, academic/government funding, China lab capex) and slow secular growth, not disruption.
Peer set (FMP tags; market cap): Waters $24.7B, Mettler-Toledo $26.4B, and adjacent healthcare names Becton Dickinson $57B, IQVIA $34.6B, ResMed $30.4B, Edwards Lifesciences $54.3B, Alcon $34.0B, Cardinal Health $56B, Haleon $43.3B, Insmed $24.2B. The truest analytical-instruments comps here are Waters and Mettler-Toledo; Agilent's ~22× forward multiple is broadly in line with that quality cohort — again, priced, not cheap.
9. Management, capital allocation & guidance
- Capital allocation: balanced and shareholder-friendly — FY25 ~$425M buybacks and ~$282M dividends (payout ~20%, yield ~0.8%), light capex (~$0.41B), and net leverage held under 0.8×. Occasional bolt-on M&A (FY24 ~$0.86B acquisitions). This is a return-of-capital + margin-expansion profile, appropriate for a mature compounder.
- Insider activity: the sampled Form 4s are routine — F-InKind tax withholdings, an award, and one small open-market sale (director Dolsten, 1,600 shares at $135.42, 2026-05-29). CEO McDonnell's activity is tax-withholding, not discretionary selling. No alarming cluster in the window.
- Management's own guidance (self-interested — half-weight): In the Q2'26 release (2026-05-27), management raised FY26 guidance: revenue $7.39B–$7.49B (up 6.3%–7.8% reported, 4.5%–6.0% core), non-GAAP operating-margin expansion ~85 bps at the midpoint, and non-GAAP EPS $6.00–$6.10 (+8¢ at the midpoint). Q3'26 guide: revenue $1.83B–$1.85B (+5.0%–6.5% reported) and non-GAAP EPS $1.48–$1.50. CEO McDonnell cited "broad-based strength across key end markets," margin gains from the Ignite Operating System, and replacement-cycle momentum. Treat as management's own book, half-weighted; it is consistent with the consensus estimate path this note uses.
10. Catalysts & what to watch
- Next earnings: 2026-08-26 (Q3'26; Street EPS $1.47, revenue ~$1.84B; management guided non-GAAP EPS $1.48–$1.50, revenue $1.83B–$1.85B). Watch core revenue growth and whether the China/pharma recovery is holding.
- Margin execution ("Ignite"): continued non-GAAP operating-margin expansion (Q2 was +130 bps YoY) is the main EPS lever given modest top-line growth.
- End-market recovery: pharma R&D budgets, academic/government funding, and especially China lab capex — the swing factors on whether core growth accelerates toward the bull case.
- Replacement cycle: uptake of new platforms (e.g. 9500 ICP-MS) as an instrument-refresh driver.
- Capital returns / M&A: pace of buybacks and any bolt-on deals.
Thesis tripwires (what would change the call): core revenue growth rolling back toward zero (renewed end-market downturn); margin expansion stalling; a large, dilutive acquisition; or a multiple that re-rates toward 25×+ with no growth acceleration (which would move us from Watch toward Avoid on valuation).
11. Key risks
- End-market cyclicality (structural): revenue tracks pharma R&D, academic/government funding, and China lab capex — FY24 was a down year, and a fresh downturn would stall the recovery. With no valuation cushion, that is the primary risk.
- Valuation / no margin of safety: ~22× forward for ~6% revenue growth leaves little room for disappointment; a de-rating toward the peer trough would hurt.
- China / geopolitics & tariffs: meaningful Asia-Pacific exposure and management's own risk factors flag tariff/trade-policy and currency swings.
- Slow secular growth: a mature instruments market caps the upside; the story is compounding, not acceleration.
- Acquisition-built book: ~$4.9B goodwill/intangibles (~39% of assets) means execution/integration and impairment risk if deals underperform.
- No expert corroboration: unlike conviction names, there is zero independent panel support in the Synthos KB — the call rests solely on fundamentals and quant.
12. Verdict, position sizing & monitoring
Watch. Agilent is a genuinely high-quality business — 53% gross margin, 21% ROE, 12.5% ROIC, ~$1.15B FCF, sub-0.8× net leverage, a sticky recurring razor-and-blade base, and a credible margin-expansion program. But it is growing revenue only ~6%, the ~22× forward multiple already prices the quality, the stock has lagged the market for a year, and there is no expert conviction and no margin of safety at $131. That combination is a textbook Watch: a name to own on weakness, not to chase here.
- Sizing: if already held, a ~2–3% quality-defensive position is reasonable; we would not initiate aggressively at this price. A pullback toward the low-$120s (near/below the 200-DMA and toward our bear zone) would improve the risk/reward materially.
- Monitoring: re-underwrite on the §10 tripwires; formal re-score each earnings print. This verdict is logged as a tracked Synthos call as of 2026-07-03 at $130.69.
- Single biggest risk: end-market/replacement-cycle cyclicality with no valuation cushion to absorb a miss.
Provenance & disclosures
- Traceability: 0 KB claims, breadth 0 — there is no expert coverage of Agilent in the Synthos knowledge base, so no
claim_ids are cited. Fabricated conviction is structurally impossible (claim-ID reconciliation), and this note states plainly that it is fundamentals-/quant-driven. - Data as-of: fundamentals 2026-04-30 (Q2'26) · estimates & prices 2026-07-02/03 · no expert claims. Forward figures are analyst consensus (FMP) or management guidance, labeled as estimates.
- Non-GAAP note: forward P/E and EPS-path figures use non-GAAP consensus (how Agilent guides and how the Street multiples the stock); trailing multiples use GAAP. Both bases are labeled where used.
- Management caveat: Agilent's guidance is management's own book, half-weighted by design.
- Not investment advice. Independent research, educational and informational only, never personalized. Hypothetical/forward figures are labeled; the only performance numbers Synthos will headline are the live, real-money Flagship's.
- Version: 2026-07-03. Prior versions available via the deep-dive version dropdown ("based on the info at the time").